Friday, December 9, 2011

Labour is hard

Since I’m pregnant and on baby forums a lot, I hear a lot of stuff along the lines of this article. That birth can be a natural, empowered process. That there is too much fear out there. That there is too much medicalisation of what is essentially a “natural” process.

Coming from India where birth is actually as ‘natural’ as it gets for most women, I have a less rosy view. The majority of women in India have no choice but to go natural and give birth in a non-medical set-up. The result is our appalling infant and maternal mortality rate.

I know I’m courting controversy here. I just wish the propounders of this natural philosophy would qualify what they mean by ‘natural’ and how ‘natural’ they are recommending. There is an assumption that they are only speaking to people in the developed world where natural would be assisted in your own home in hopefully sterile conditions with midwife and hopefully attendant medical equipment standing by and the option of calling an ambulance if anything goes wrong. Wish they would say so.

For every bit of research that comes up about current medical practice is not ideal, I wish they would have an explanation from those in favour of that practice on why they are continuing with it. Instead, all we hear are polarized views. For example, someone recently posted research on why doctors should wait before cutting the chord. What I’d like is for this very useful piece of information to be weighed up against research which tells us the benefits of not waiting to cut the chord. And then let us decide.

Similarly, there’s research on how inducing labour by drugs generally leads to use of more drugs (epidurals) and sometimes c-sections. But the articles I read concerning this research don’t square off against other research which justifies the current practice of inducing if contractions aren’t regular 12 hours after water has broken to prevent infection.

At the time of labour, one must be able to trust one’s doctor – who one assumes has read both sets of research – to make the right decision. That is what the doctor is for. That is why the doctor comes in to take a decision if there are deviations from the standard delivery. Yes, we need to empower ourselves with information and ask questions. And the doctors should answer them, which doesn’t happen enough. But sometimes there is no black and white answer and someone has to take a call. If you want it to be you to take a call going against the doctor’s advice, then do you waive the right to blame the doctor if something goes wrong?

I also have a problem with this nothing-to-fear and empowerment rhetoric. I’m pretty sure it’s impossible to have a pain-free labour. One may be able to control this pain through breathing, meditation or medication. Regardless, there will be pain. To fear pain is a human instinct. Isn’t that the most ‘natural’ reaction? Why fight it? Why this fear of fear?I’d rather acknowledge that I’m afraid than pretend I’m not. To fear something doesn’t necessarily mean we don’t face it. “Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgment that something else is more important than fear.” Why not teach women to be courageous instead of telling them not to be afraid?

I hear so much about how images in the media make women afraid of labour. Actually, I feel the images in the media provide a very hunky-dory view of what labour is. It is far more gruesome and generally a longer process than the images in the media. I hear very few detailed accounts of labour and that’s why I appreciate when birth stories are shared.

[Read GB's birth story here, R's Mom's here and mine here]

I don’t find these stories to be scaremongering. I found them useful to have a realistic picture of what lies ahead. I was lucky that my sister gave me as honest a description of the process of labour and the kind of pain to expect before I went in. I’m also glad that through my sister I got more than an inkling of how hard the first three months of being a mom are.

Frankly, I’d rather know the worst case scenario and prepare for it mentally. That’s me. There are people for whom putting a positive spin on things works. I’m not one of them. I’d rather call a spade a spade.

I didn’t find labour particularly empowering or beautiful. Of course, for some women it might be. But I don’t see why it should be. All this talk about empowerment sounds like a PR exercise.

For me the aim was and will be to get my baby out into the world safely. This was not one of those ‘the journey is more important than the destination’ trips. I didn’t want to linger to smell the roses or savour the process. It was brutal and if there was an easier way I’d love to take it. People eulogizing about labour sounds to me like women who say their period is a privilege because it allows them to have babies. Right, but if you could have a baby without sitting on a pile of blood and cramping every month wouldn’t you rather? Is there anything empowering about a period?

Yes, it is empowering to know what you can withstand. But I would hope one choose ‘natural’ labour because it is generally the healthy choice for mother and child and not to test the limits of one’s pain tolerance or to be empowered. Having a baby is like running a marathon but it’s not the same.

My problem with all this talk of empowerment and beauty in childbirth is that it will work for only those women who need to talk up an experience, who need to see the positive in it. And for some women, expecting labour to be a rosy experience is going to end in nothing but tears and disappointment and a sense that they weren’t good enough because they didn’t enjoy it. Many of us are okay with it being the pain in the ass and thereabouts that it is, given that we have no choice in the matter, and would rather not call it anything else. This does not in any way prevent us from choosing to go through it or being awestruck by the beauty and miracle that our babies are when they do arrive.

11 comments:

R's Mom said...

Okie...first lemme tell you I read that article before I read your post...and hence I was all set to write against it..till I read what you wrote...I loved this post...

I had a horrid delivery (http://www.womensweb.in/2010/11/the-delivery-story-and-beyond/)

But again, I think it was more of the doctor's mistake than anything else

I love what you wrote...My delivery was (rather is still with the fissure) a pain in the ass...I realised, I was not a martyr, but was plain foolish not to have read earlier and asked for epidural..

I would hope one choose ‘natural’ labour because it is generally the healthy choice for mother and child and not to test the limits of one’s pain tolerance or to be empowered - This is so true....its not a marathon..giving birth cannot be compared to ANYTHING else in this world and if I ever have a second child, I may as well go for a C sec...

you are very right when you say 'it was not one of those ‘the journey is more important than the destination’ trips. I didn’t want to linger to smell the roses or savour the process. It was brutal and if there was an easier way I’d love to take it.'

I loved this post Bride :)

Garima said...

I agree with you on a lot of fronts. In my mind, we have made such advances in medical sciences for a reason. Lets use them and not fight them.
Yes child birth is natural, beautiful and at the same time its painful and really hard! If using the right drugs with the doctors advice is useful, then do that.

I remember during my pregnancy and child birth, my birth plan included an epidural as an end measure. But on the day, I was in excuruciating pain (Surprise Surprise!) And I chose to take epi dural sooner. The best decision for me. Yes, I was still in pain during the final push, but I am glad I made the process more memorable for me and my husband!

Anonymous said...

Read your post and loved it..i have a 13 month daughter delivered through C Section in Singapore...my husband and I had the same experience with a no of people (mostly westerners) warning us about Singapore doctors forcing a C section when one is not required or inducing labor to meet their vacation plans...

It was tougher for my husband actually, because in a difficult situation he would have to make a call (given my fragile emotional state) and he fell ill equipped to start doubting our doctor...

I find the same biases flow on to things like breast feeding, pumping milk, co-sleeping...though not with the same dire consequences...

In the end i think the ideal approach is to (1) Pick a doctor couples can see themselves having 100% faith in (2) Hope for natural but be prepared for all consequences and (3) once the baby is born, just focus on her and forget about the labor (I found myself unconsciously begrudging my 1 day old baby for not coming naturally! As though she had anything to do with it!)

Love your post - hope more women read it..

GB said...

After going through 26 hours of labour and then having a C-section, I'm now of the opinion that a C-section is much better. Controversial view, I know. A view that I never expected to have. But the whole thing got over in an hour. I had to lie down in the same position the next day but I was up on my feet by Day 2. And off painkillers by Day 3. After that, I've pretty much been doing everything I was before delivery. Not been going for my long walks- but I doubt I'd have had the time for it anyway!! I was able to breastfeed right after the surgery too. The bleeding isn't as much as you'd have after a normal deliver either. I keep hearing that women after C-section take a long time to recover...I have no idea what that's about!! Even the scar is already fading...If at all I have another kid (by accident, of course ;)), I wouldn't mind at all if it's a C-sec again.

Poet Mamma said...

Well, almost 9 years ago, I read a lot and contemplated a lot on natural labor.

When the time came when facing 36 hours of labor, I opted for epidural, and said no to systemic drugs that get (possibly) passed to the baby.

My Ob-Gyn - a kind elderly gentleman with decades of experience, peeked in and had said "Dont become a martyr, take the epidural. You will not be any less of a mother. Plus, you will be in a better position to greet the baby once she comes!" Which was dot on.

And everything else, the dilemma, the bravado went out the window.

Not to mention - second time, the choice was a no brainer.

So I ask all those who are yet undecided - "Do you want to become a martyr? " :-)

The Bride said...

@R's Mom Wanted to link to your birth story but was too lazy to go through the Women's Web archives so thanks for digging it up for me :)

@Garima I tried to wait to get the epidural to see if I could endure without it and in the end, was screaming for one but did not get it (I delivered in a public hospital). Now I know better :)


@anony we have the same issues here in HK and it's true that there are doctors that do push for c-secs but really I think they do it when they sense the women are open to it (and many HK women are open to elective c-secs and asking for it). I have seen three private doctors across two pregnancies and not one raised the option of a c-section to me. However, if it was suggested to me in advance, I would maybe get a second opinion and decide. If an emergerccy c-sec was suggested during labour, I would trust my doctor. I liked your three points and 3) is particularly is something to remember. I feel that getting too stuck on the idea of 'natural' can cause unnecessary stress.

You are right that the pro-natural brigade can be similarly oppressive - particularly in breastfeeding. Again, my policy is try your best but don't kill yourself if it's not happening. I feel all this pressure on women to be earth mothers is only slightly better than those that push in the opposite direction.

@GB c-sec after hours of labour is like worst of both worlds. I'm leaning towards your view on c-secs too, in the sense that I think that they are the easier option. Much is made of how they are more painful AFTER the delivery but I think with today's technology, many women have your experience where they are up and about pretty quickly. I know a couple of women who have had one baby 'natural' and one c-sec and say c-sec is less painful and easier to deal with overall.

That said, I would still opt for spontaneous labour over a planned c-sec. One thing that resonates with me is that when you go into labour spontaneously, it is when your baby is ready to come out. Planned c-sections may occur when the baby is not fully ready, generally they are around 37 weeks, while my baby was in there 39 and a half weeks. I'm not referring to c-secs like yours which are called emergency c-secs.

Once you've had a c-section, having a natural delivery for the next child becomes more complicated. It's called VBAC, and you need an experienced doctor to get you through it. So many women just opt to do a c-sec again which is fair enough.

@PoetMamma There are small risks to mother and child associated with epidural. When I requested one, I was asked to sign a waiver acknowledging I understood these. So I think it's good for mums to go over these risks beforehand and decide if they are ok with them.
A few people react very badly to epidurals. My aunt and cousin had severe migraine and vomitting for a week after. However, this is rare, but something to keep in mind.

On the other hand, another doctor I know is very pro-epidurals becuase she feels that women have more strength to push with them. In my case, I definitely think epidural wouold have helped me conserve energy to push because when the time came to push, I was literally a zombie.

My feeling is that epidurals have been done enough to make them a risk I am willing to take, though I would try without it. This time I'm going to be very clear on how quickly I need to tell them I want one in order to get it though.

Aish said...

Unlike the others who have commented, I am yet to deliver my baby (hopefully, this week!).. but I totally agree with you. Read the article, and I feel that this line of thought is very common in baby forums which includes a large western population. I ve read in some forums how women cried the entire night when they found out that the baby is breech and need a c-section. I mean, c'mon, seriously -- get some perspective.

They keep hyping about home births, but like you said, their home births have a complete fall-back support system.
And the entire aim of the pregnancy is to have a happy, healthy child -- why does it have to be a pain bearing competition. If in the process I have options to avoid the pain and be more peaceful, then what is the big deal about it?

I think the western world, particularly, the US -- has become obsessed with this entire "no-drugs" labor and delivery concept and paranoid about how their entire medical system is out to ensure that women stay away from natural births!

The Bride said...

@Aish good luck with your delivery! And you are right, it seems the tide has turned in the West and it seems to be going the other way in an extreme way.

RS said...

Hey! I so completely agree with the entire post. Nobody can define what decision a woman in labour needs to take - Even today, I tend to explain to people that knowing I had a small baby with a big head, induced labor for 24hrs was not something that convinced me-so went in for the C-sec and my ob-gyn after arguing enough with me did the C-sec and was gld because even she felt that the baby would not have withstood the 24hrs of labor!
So, yes I didnt go through the 'natural' way and I dont regret it either!

The Bride said...

@RS yeah and the baby is fine and that's what matters.

Scribblehappy said...

I so agree with everything you've written. The general tendency to glorify natural delivery does appear to be misplaced and women often find themselves under some kind of tacit pressure to deliver normally. I understand that natural labour with minimal injuries to the child and the mother is indeed the best possible scenario but this 'natural is always the best' mindset may cause many to want to go 'normal'even in the face of complications--with disastrous consequences.

Like a commenter said, why does it have to be a pain bearing competition?

I had a nightmarish normal delivery the first time. The second time I had a planned c-sec at 39 weeks and it was like a dream.I don't mean to say that the c-sec is always better than normal, I am just saying that for some women and in certain circumstances it might indeed be the better option.